Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 08:25

What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
The 2025 Bootid meteor shower peaks June 27: Here's what to expect - Space
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
LSU wins the 2025 Men's College World Series - NCAA.com
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Have you made a female relative or friend squirt?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Anthony says 1st HR made better by Red Sox win - ESPN
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
New COVID-19 variant detected in Washington state, health officials say - KING5.com
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Don't call it a rom-com: With wit and heart, "Materialists" transcends the tired form - Salon.com